Baby boomer housing bust: coming to Australia?

Published 08 April 2013 09:06, Updated 26 November 2013 18:35

+font -font print
Baby boomer housing bust: coming to Australia?

Australia needs to carefully evaluate the location and scale of its new housing developments if it doesn’t want to end up with a US-style glut of unsaleable McMansions. Photo: Erin Jonasson

They’re calling it the great senior sell off and it’s scaring suburban America. Still recovering from the housing market crisis of 2007 to 2009, the latest concern in the US is a looming glut of unsellable suburban homes as ageing baby boomers seek to downsize.

Demographer Arthur C Nelson, director of the Metropolitan Research Centre at the University of Utah, has analysed data from the American Housing Survey, finding that over the past 30 years, 80 per cent of new homes built in the US were detached single family dwellings. Much of this new construction was of the McMansion variety, exceeding 230 square metres in size, as the post-war baby boomers (born between 1946-1968) raised their families.

But as American baby boomers turn 65, many are selling their empty nest, often seeking apartments or townhouses in rapidly gentrifying inner city areas near services and public transport and in popular sunbelt destinations. The worry is that the number of people in their peak buying years coming behind them is estimated to be about a quarter of that in previous generations. Like boomers, new generations of US buyers want smaller, more accessible homes and they are also are more likely to rent. The mass market for McMansions has shrunk.

Professor Nelson expects the next housing crash to hit when isolated seniors in car-dependent suburbs find “ageing in place” (making changes in the home to allow seniors to stay home for as long as possible) untenable. He predicts that between 1.5 million to 2 million baby-boomer homes will hit the market each year from 2020 on. Those who can’t sell may simply abandon the family home.

Could this happen in Australia?

Changing housing careers

In many ways, Australia’s social trends have echoed those of the US. Our own baby boomers are advancing towards retirement. Over-65s will nearly treble from 8.8 per cent in 1971 to about 21 per cent by 2026 and 28 per cent by 2056.

Our life cycles and housing careers have changed too. For most of the 20th century, the expected pathway was for young adults to leave the family home, rent in the transition years before marriage, buy a starter home before upgrading to a second or third home along with children and growing household wealth. Outright home ownership underpinned financial security in retirement, while renting was viewed very much as a transitional tenure.

However, as in the US, social changes along with affordability pressures have seen adult children staying home longer and purchasing homes later. Many low and moderate-income earners are unable to achieve home ownership at all, particularly in the major cities. More seniors are reaching retirement with substantial mortgages or are in long-term rental, having fallen out of home ownership after a personal crisis such as divorce.

These changes reflect fundamental demographic shifts, with one-person households and couples without children the fastest growing household types. Our cultural make-up is also becoming more diverse, with unpredictable implications for household formations and dwelling preferences in the future.

Changing suburbia?

Like the US, nearly 80 per cent of Australia’s housing is detached.

But where Australia differs from the US is in the scale and nature of suburbia. In the US, cheap loans and other government incentives encouraged home buyers to favour new homes in the suburbs, rather than renovate existing city dwellings. Combined with an exuberant program of highway development, liberal land release policies, and a vigorous construction industry, US suburbs flourished in the post-war decades. At the same time, disinvestment and a hollowing-out of inner-city areas combined with racial tensions to feed a process of “white flight” to the suburbs.

Stringent development codes for these new suburbs – large minimum lot sizes, prescriptive dwelling design specifications and zoning prohibitions against units and townhouses – created a virtual drawbridge, literally designing out diversity.

By contrast, Australian planning policies governing suburban release have always been linked to population forecasts and household trends, informed by the demographic and economic fundamentals that drive housing demand, preventing large scale over supply of dwelling lots, and avoiding “leap frog” development out of sequence with planned urban expansion.

Australian planners – though much maligned – also acted early to overcome local barriers to diverse housing types. For instance, NSW planning policy in the 1980s ensured that homes for seniors could be developed in residential areas, providing housing options for those who downsize within existing neighbourhoods.

Preserving housing value

If Australia’s middle and outer suburbs – made up of traditional detached suburban homes – haven’t fared as well as the favoured inner ring in terms of real estate values over the past 30 years, we’ve certainly escaped the housing market failures that have blighted whole communities in many cities of the US.

Preserving this fundamental market stability is important, and will require careful urban policy in the future.

The real lesson from the US is that homogeneous, inflexible and prolific housing development – the “build it and they’ll buy it” model – represents long term risks, and can be difficult to turn around when demand changes.

The real lesson from the US is that homogeneous, inflexible and prolific housing development – the “build it and they’ll buy it” model – represents long term risks, and can be difficult to turn around when demand changes.

That means Australians need to carefully evaluate the locations and scale of new housing. Particular risks are likely in coastal retirement destinations beyond capital cities, many of which have seen increased numbers of detached suburban developments as retirees cash up their city properties for a dream home near the sea. But without accessible health facilities and services, or diverse and sustainable employment growth, these housing markets will struggle once the sea-changers require higher levels of care and return to the major population centres.

In contrast to surplus McMansions, another future weak spot in Australia may be poor quality high rise apartments in marginal outer locations. An ageing vertical suburbia may prove difficult to renew or adapt to unpredictable future shifts, once the current trend towards older, smaller household stabilises.

Our humble terrace has proved remarkably resilient and adaptable over more than a century, representing a form of highly desirable housing as the backbone of the dense, walkable neighbourhoods that home buyers increasingly demand. New generation terraces and innovative medium density housing offer longer term flexibility – and are generally compatible with existing suburban typologies.

As boomers age, we can breathe new life into older suburbs by encouraging more conversion of existing stock – splitting homes in two. This can provide short term help for stay at home kids, and might also provide carer accommodation in future. Helping boomers adapt their homes to changing life cycles will mean less stock hitting the market at one time, hence less pressure on prices.

NSW has led the way by permitting granny flats in residential zones, providing a potential income stream for retirees, while contributing to more diverse rental options in established suburbs.

Reinvesting in the suburbs

Professor Nelson urges Americans to renew and retro-fit their ageing suburbs, rather than continuing 20th century urban sprawl, in part to protect existing home owners from further foreclosure crises.

While Australia’s current preoccupation is a perceived national under-supply of new homes, the real challenge is to unlock existing housing opportunities within our own ageing middle and outer ring locations. That means sustained policy support to transition existing lower value areas – at risk of further market decline – to the opportunity sites for future growth.

Your housing equity may depend on it.

Nicole Gurran is an associate professor in the Urban and Regional Planning Program at the University of Sydney. Her research focuses on comparative planning systems, managing urban and regional change, and housing affordability. She is the author of Australian Urban Land Use Planning (Sydney University Press 2007, 2011).

This article first appeared on The Conversation

Copyright © 2010–2013, The Conversation Media Group

Topics:

Comments